Conclusion: The Rise of Library 2.0 by Talis et al.

The notion of “readily available information” that is accessible anywhere and anytime (Chad and Miller,p.4) forces users, such as ourselves, to question Library 2.0. As stated in the article, it is a library service that has the ability to fulfill the needs of the modern user and their expectations (Chad and Miller, p.4,8). However, as pointed out by Chad and Miller, one of the limitations such as “up front charges” may be a barrier in enabling the notion of “readily available information”. Thus, How can we further evaluate the benefits and cons? What are some of the criterions that can be used as a level of indicator? Are there articles that offer a different point of view about Library 2.0 (i.e. more insight towards Library 2.0, negative impacts or downside of Library 2.0). Overall, the notion of Library 2.0 appears to be a “rational” concept because of its ability to adapt to change in order to meet the demands of the users and their expectations. While encouraging participation feedback, it is also a system that provides information that is more “easily obtainable” through a “user-driven” method (Curran et al, p.288). However, we need to ask ourselves if such a concept is viable and practical?